In an effort to bind employees to certain duties without creating an employment contract, many employers are sending offer letters setting forth the terms and conditions of an employment relationship and requiring employees to sign them to show their acceptance of such terms and conditions. However, in doing so, employers may be binding themselves to certain obligations to which they never intended to be bound. Northeast Real Estate Services, LLC was one such employer.
In 1998, Northeast Real Estate Services recruited Stephen Prozinski to become Northeast’s chief operating officer and chief financial officer. Northeast did not provide a written employment agreement to Prozinski, but provided him with an offer letter that stated, in part:
During the first 24 months of employment, if your employment is terminated by the Company, then the Company will pay you the equivalent of 1 full year’s pay including benefits.
The letter included a space for Prozinski to sign, under the phrase “Accepted By,” which Prozinski signed. Ten months after he began his employment with Northeast, Prozinski was terminated by Northeast, for among other reasons, submitting improper reimbursement requests, financial mismanagement, and complaints from female employees alleging that Prozinski sexually harassed them. Northeast also discovered that Prozinski had been distributing pornographic emails to employees and exchanging obscene emails with male employees and others outside of the office.
Prozinski sued Northeast after his termination claiming, in part, that Northeast breached his employment agreement by failing to pay him the 1 year severance that was set forth in the offer letter that he had signed. The Court agreed with Prozinski and awarded him the 1 year severance payment, among other things.
How can employers avoid Northeast’s problem? Employers should understand first and foremost that sending an offer letter and requiring the employee to sign it may create a legally enforceable contract between the employer and the employee that the employer did not intend to create. Further, the offer letter signed by the employee may also destroy the “at-will” relationship that an employer may have intended if it is drafted in such a way as to show that the employment relationship was for a term of years, whether stated explicitly or implicitly.
The following are some ways to ensure that an offer letter will not bind an employer to anything more than what the employer intended:
Because offer letters may be deemed to be contracts of employment, employers need to be careful in their drafting of them. If an offer letter is necessary, do not assume that it either is or is not a contract - review the wording carefully to ensure that only what is intended is set forth in the offer letter. If the employer intends to bind the employee or itself to certain obligations, then a properly drafted employment agreement is often the better practice to avoid unintended liabilities.
The Labor, Employment, and Employee Benefits Group provides compliance advice, drafts policies, conducts training, and defends employers against workplace claims and litigation. For more information please contact a member of Burns & Levinson’s Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Group or email us at clientservices@burnslev.com.
The Labor, Employment Chair: Shepard Davidson Evelyn A. Haralampu | Paul R. Mastrocola Lawrence P. Murray Paul M. Sanford Paul E. Stanzler Laura R. Studen | Mark F. Murphy Michael P. Murphy Nancy A. Newark Victoria L. Walton |
If you have questions regarding this Update, please contact Renee Inomata at rinomata@burnslev.com or 617-345-3340.
If you would like to be added to or removed from the mailing list for B&L Employment Solutions Updates or other Burns & Levinson publications, please send your name, email address and notice to clientservices@burnslev.com or call Renee Bella at 617-345-3303.
This Client Update provides general information and does not constitute legal advice.
© 2005 Burns & Levinson LLP.
All rights reserved.
www.burnslev.com
HQ 617.345.3000