If Kodak is Just a "Summary Judgment Case," Why are we Still Discussing it Three Years Later?
Ronald S. Katz of Coudert Brothers LLP
Groups that do not like landmark cases sometimes go into a state of denial. For example, many fruitless post-decision battles have been fought against Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
The New ISNI
Ronald S. Katz of Coudert Brothers LLP
Independent Service Network International (ISNI) started out as an organization of what was then called Third-Part.
Antitrust Law in the High-Technology Industry: Recent Developments in United States v. Microsoft Provides Insight to Department of Justice's Stance on Antitrust Violations
John H. Brinsley of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
On November 5, 1999, United States District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson issued his much anticipated Findings of Fact in United States v. Microsoft, 65 F. Supp. 2d 1, 1999 WL 1001107 (D.D.C. 1999).
Quo Vadis Microsoft?
Neil A. Campbell of Lexpert
It seems everywhere you turn these days, someone is talking about Microsoft.
The Benefits and Burdens of Kodak from a Litigant's Perspective
Ronald S. Katz of Coudert Brothers LLP
As co-counsel for plaintiffs in the Kodak case, we were obviously pleased by the result, which went beyond the Nin.
Convergence Of Powers In The New Media Sector And How It Relates To Competition Law
Michael M Sax of Michael M. Sax
Mr. Sax raises interesting questions regarding competition law in the light of the new media sector.
Generating Productivity Growth: A Review of the Role of Workplace Practices and Computers
United States Department of Labor-Office of the Solicitor
This Department of Labor report summarizes new research that uses detailed establishment level data to examine the respective contributions of human capital investments, workplace practices, and computers on labor productivity.
U.S. and Microsoft, A Fight to the Finish?
John Stuart Smith of Nixon Peabody LLP
This article reviews District Judge Thomas Penfield's findings of fact in the Microsoft Antitrust decision. The findings of fact issued is the first step in the decisional process that will next include the conclusions of law and final judgment.
Recent Cases Reveal Gaps in Draft Antitrust/IP Guidelines
Ronald S. Katz of Coudert Brothers LLP
After two administrations in which the antitrust laws were not a high priority, many expected that the current administration's antitrust enforcers would bring sorely needed competence and energy to the high technology sector. Disappointment was widespread with the Antitrust Division's first major high-technology action - the Microsoft stipulated judgment.
Microsoft and the Antitrust Laws in the Digital Age the Browser Wars and Beyond
Gary L. Benton of Coudert Brothers LLP
A recurring question raised in public debate over the legal battle between the government and Microsoft is whether.
U.S. v. Microsoft, The Fight Continues
John Stuart Smith of Nixon Peabody LLP
This article reviews Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's conclusions of law in the Microsoft Case and the likelihood of the court granting the government's relief requests.
Differing Perspectives on Kodak
Ronald S. Katz of Coudert Brothers LLP
Since the Supreme Court's opinion in Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 112 S. Ct. 2072 came down, critics and practicing attorneys in the antitrust field have differed greatly on the impact and importance of the Kodak ruling.
Regulator Advises Banks on PC Banking
Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss, P.C.
On August 24, 1998 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") advised banks on ways to identify and.