The cost to the publisher, producer or ad agency for the loss of an irreplaceable negative may just have gone up. A June 2003 decision of the New York Supreme Court by Justice Heitler may have moved the marker in a case brought by George Dubose, well known photographer of celebrity musicians, whose web site says it all: "Twenty years later, Warner Bros. Records used this image for the B52s Greatest Hits package and then proceeded to lose the original negatives for this [image of B52s in front of Unisphere for Rolling Stone magazine] and three other shots. Stay tuned for further legal ramifications." George needs to update his website: the June decision is itself a "ramification" of significance in its analysis of applicable tort law on the damages available to the plaintiff photographer for negligent loss of personal property in the form of original negatives.

The Supreme Court of Canada examines the issue Seventeen year old Pascale Aubry was sitting on the steps of a.

In litigation, to be successful you must be prepared. Comprehensive and proper prepa.

Although the costs of taking cases to trial seem to increase each year, increased expenditures have not resulted in.

The techniques of demonstrative evidence have become so widespread that it is no longer unusual to walk into a cou.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then a moving picture is worth a hundred thousand words. Courtroom animati.

Bivin & McNamara, L.L.P proudly accepts all types of legitimate injury cases. We represent people who have been in.