On November 24, 2003 the Federal Communication Commission's number portability rule went into effect in the largest 100 metropolitan statistical areas. The remaining areas will have until May 24, 2004 to comply. In addition to allowing consumers the ability to switch their wireless carrier without losing their current wireless number, local number portability also requires landline carriers to allow consumers to transfer their numbers to wireless carriers. The end result is that a telephone number that was previously a landline number, may now in fact belong to a wireless number.
On February 20, 2003, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") rewrote some of its rules for local telephone competition. For a number of reasons the ultimate impact of the FCC's decision on competition is unclear. What seems clear, however, is that the decision signals a dramatic political shift at the FCC at the expense of Chairman Michael Powell.
Publication from the Federal Communications Commission which describes how consumers may file a lawsuit based on a violation of the Communications Act in Federal District Court or file a legal action at the FCC.
The Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2004 would amend the Telephone Consumer Protection Act to restore an exemption allowing businesses to send unsolicited facsimile ads to persons with whom they have an established business relationship. The FCC wiped out this exemption in rule-making proceedings effective January 1, 2005. Plaintiff class action firms are filing TCPA unsolicited fax class action cases across the country. This article discusses the history and current state of the Act.
This article discusses a decision by the 9th National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China to reorganize various ministries, reducing the total number from 40 to 29. This will especially effect the communication industry.
Last week, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released the fifth in a series of orders since 1998 modifying its rules relating to "slamming" (the unauthorized changing of a subscriber's telecommunications service provider). In the process, the FCC has-in the pursuit of greater consumer protection-significantly increased the responsibilities and burdens of providers of wireline local and long distance telecom services irrespective of whether the service provider is the unauthorized carrier ("slammer"), the authorized ("slammed") carrier, or the executing carrier that processes the change.
In our March 28, 2003 DWT Telecom Alert, we advised you of new and significant changes to the FCC's "slamming" rules. Since then, a new Federal Court of Appeals decision and two new FCC actions have thrown the rules of the road in this area into even greater turmoil. Indeed, these actions may have serious implications for the entire FCC/state scheme regulating the verification of telecom service changes and enforcement of slamming rules.
The Quad countries have begun initial discussions regarding the structure for the next round of WTO services t.
The telecom mess has gotten messier. Thanks to the ingenious efforts of enterprising class action lawyers, a split has emerged among three federal courts of appeals, further complicating the legal swamp created by the 1996 Telecommunications Act.
This article discusses an antitrust lawsuit filed against Pacific Bell that alleges Pacific Bell monopolized local exchange service in California by preventing customers from switching to Caltech.
This article examines developments in the regulation of Internet access services.
Tips from the Federal Communications Commission for businesses on how to prepare for the year 2000.
For companies in the broadcasting, cellular communications and other media businesses, the licenses granted by the .
Publication from the Federal Communications Commission which describes how to file a complaint with them.
The liberalization of the European telecommunications markets, on the one hand has lead to the creation of numerou.
Although a last minute regulatory effort had become necessary, the German legislator and the rulemakers in the Ger.
Recently, the Federal Communications Commission adopted its Advanced Services Third Report and Order, which require.
This article discusses the recent U.S. Court of Appeals decision which vacated and remanded the FCC order relating to reciprocal compensation for ISP traffic. This decision will have significant impact on local exchange carriers, other telecommunications carriers, ISPs and other enhanced services providers.
This article reviews the U.S. Court of Appeals decision for the District of Columbia whereby the district court reviewed the FCC's order concerning carriers rights to collocate their equipment at the incumbent local exchange carriers' facilities.
June 20 of this year, the Second Circuit decided a case called Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko v. Bell Atlantic Corp., the so-called Trinko case, which, we believe, radically changed the antitrust law in two respects: it expanded the scope of duties that incumbent firms owed to rivals; and it changed the traditional standing limits that barred suits by indirect purchasers.
Local Action on Siting of Telecommunications Facilities. Amends and reenacts ?15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia re.
A business-to-business (B2B) marketplace or exchange is a service which matches buyers and sellers in a particular industry. Sales take place either through online catalogs posted by each supplier or through real-time Internet-based auctions. In either case, the consolidation of sales through a single marketplace fosters price discovery and reduces the inefficiencies that are otherwise associated with highly fragmented purchasing processes.
Yesterday, the FCC adopted its UNE Triennial Review decision, the most sweeping ruling affecting the telecommunications industry since 1996, and one that is certain to have far-reaching effects in the telecommunications industry for years to come. The decision, which is the result of much debate and compromise, is essentially a "mixed bag" for the competitive industry, with some "wins" and some "losses."
Publication from the Federal Communications Commission which describes universal service programs for low income telecommunications customers.
Discussion paper from the Federal Communications Commission regarding the impact of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on people with disabilities.
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has recently amended its International Settlements Policy ("ISP.
For years, computer users have used their Internet service to implement a type of voice telephone service. Typically, it was a poor substitute for traditional voice telephone service. The quality of voice over internet protocol, or VoIP, calls was unreliable, making the connection between callers cumbersome. As a result, the primary application of VoIP was as a niche service for those seeking a substitute for expensive overseas calling.
Answers to frequently asked questions from the Federal Communications Commission regarding the rules regarding access to telecommunications services necessary for the provision of health care services by rural health care providers at rates comparable to those paid for similar services in urban areas.
Until a short while ago, in many African countries the state-owned operator was both the monopoly operator and reg.
A policy speech covering: 1) why spectrum management is important; 2) the contours of the spectrum policy debate and the FCC's role; 3) the key values and considerations the FCC Commissioner believes should guide that debate; and 4) where we go from here.
Telecommunications deregulation suffered a serious setback when the Supreme Court handed down its eagerly awaited decision in Verizon Communications v. Federal Communications Commission, and held that federal regulators could continue to force incumbent local telephone companies to share elements of their networks with rivals at heavily discounted rates.
This report details the Y2K Information and Readiness Disclosure Act.
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") proposed on August 6 to once again revise its int.
In today's economy, corporations and law firms can incur significant risk if they rely on e-discovery vendors that are not financially stable. Loss of data access due to provider bankruptcy or system shutdowns can be fatal to a case. To help clients evaluate the viability of your current or future service providers, Fios has developed the following “e-Discovery Service Provider Due Diligence Checklist”
This summary outlines many of the basic issues confronting communications law practitioners today.
This article summarizes the FCC's recent rule change by which wireless carriers must comply with the agency's Phase II E-911 wireless location mandate.
This Client Alert provides an overview of the FCC's proposed international settlement rate rules for telecommunications carriers.
With deregulation of long distance telephone providers, consumers now have more options than ever available to the.
Publication from the Federal Communications Commission which offers guidelines to help protect potential investors in wireless telecommunications services from being defrauded by unscrupulous promoters.
(By Michael Horn and Yenti Abdurrachman. Messrs. Horn and Abdurrachman are a partner and a senior associate, respe.
This alert summarizes the FCC's notice of proposed rulemaking relating to collocation issues and issues concerning deployment of new network architectures.
Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP") is arguably one of the most important recent developments in telecommunications, yet is virtually ignored by current federal and state regulations applicable to traditional telephone service. However, the growing popularity of VoIP in both the private and business sectors (some analysts claim that VoIP will replace traditional telephone service for the majority of users by the end of this decade) makes it likely that VoIP will be subjected to at least some regulatory requirements in the future.
On March 25, 2005, the FCC released an order ("Order") over two dissents (by Commissioners Adelstein and Copps) granting a petition for declaratory ruling filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. ("BellSouth"). The Order preempts separate orders of four state commissions in BellSouth's local service territory that had required BellSouth to provide DSL service to customers receiving voice services from Competitive Local Exchange Carriers ("CLECs") using unbundled loops leased by the CLECs from BellSouth.
On February 4, 2005, the FCC released its Order on Remand ("Order") in its review of the network equipment and facilities ("unbundled network elements" or "UNEs") that incumbent local telephone companies ("ILECs") must provide at "cost-based" rates to other carriers ("CLECs") for the provision of competing telephone services. The Order responds to the remand by the D.C. Circuit ("USTA II") of certain rulings by the FCC in a prior order known as the "Triennial Review Order" ("TRO"). The new rules adopted in the Order take effect on March 11, 2005.